from The Huffington Post
Read, Submit Comments, Post to Facebook
War on Poverty Book Misses the Program's Overall Successes
by Pablo Eisenberg, Senior Fellow, Georgetown Public Policy Institute
Excerpt from the article
They [the book's editors] fail to examine the long-term, more intangible impacts of the War on Poverty that do not lend themselves to statistical analysis.
For example, they don't mention the more than 1,200 community-action agencies that were established during the first year of the antipoverty effort, nor do they discuss the impact those organizations have had.
Those agencies gave birth to the concepts of citizen participation and the active involvement of poor people in public decision making, notions that have become part of our working democracy.
They also spawned thousands of local social and economic programs that reached many millions of Americans who had never before been the subject of federal attention.
Established at a county or multi-county level, these nonprofit organizations were composed of representatives of poor communities, social-service agencies, and local governments. They challenged local power structures to reorder their priorities and focus more on the needs of poor people.
With budgets often larger than those of local governments, those agencies were responsible for the vast expansion of nonprofit organizations throughout the country, probably the largest growth in nonprofits since the early 1900s.
Perhaps as important, community-action agencies pushed previously weak and poorly financed local and state governments to deal with poverty issues, overhaul their governance structures, and strengthen their financial capacities.
Nor does the book mention what could be considered one of the major legacies of the War on Poverty: the creation of new, young leaders who came from poor, working class, or minority backgrounds.
People who never before had an opportunity to run nonprofit or government agencies were for the first time given the chance to succeed or fail.
One reason the book fails to account for these outstanding achievements is because it would be harder to document them compared with other parts of the War on Poverty.
Much of the history of the community-action programs remains largely in the memories of a dwindling group of Office of Economic Opportunity and community-action employees who participated in programs firsthand five decades ago. These participants need to be interviewed before it is too late. Their perspectives and views could fill in the gaps that Legacies doesn't address.
Or perhaps a second book could explore the impact and influence of community action and its multiplicity of programs, the leadership programs that changed the way America is run, and the reform of local and state governments that strengthened our democracy.